November 2004


I don’t know enough about Ukrainian politics or its past 14 year history to make ANY comment. That doesn’t make me unique, but I’m sure fairly rare.

Which certainly makes me chuckle at all the opinions of people who are in the exact same boat, but HAVE an opinion, and feel it’s actually valid.

Don’t get me wrong, everyone’s entitled to an opinion, but jeez people start accepting that there are SOME things you don’t know and that what your minister says may not ACTUALLY be the truth from god on high.

The REALLY hilarious opinions come from American’s who, either see this as vindicating Bush’s anti-liberal movement, or as another proof that Bush and Blair are out to rule the world.

As for MY opinion, this whole thing reeks from both sides and once again shows how the world is falling into its old patterns of bloody inhuman sectarian violence.

Political slant aside, we DO have the USA to thank for this reality. The economic warfare that it so successfully campaigned against the former Soviet Union is beginning to show the corrupt and decadent result that was so evident to anyone with eyes in 1990-91.

Make no mistakes, my sympathies had always gone completely towards the USSR (and now Russia) in that whole showdown, but I am not so ignorant, or immature, as to believe that the USSR was not itself prone to gross excesses and criminality. Unlike the rabid fundamentalists preaching evangelical democracy – who are incapable of accepting ANY wrong in the practice of free-market democracy.

All we need now is to have Fox Broadcasting make a reality show out of this: “The Ukrainian Bride”, where emaciated poverty stricken women beg American men to marry them, or hire them as whores for American business men.

Personally, I’m just waiting for some current Archduke Franz Ferdinand to be shot by an anarchist (or more likely a CIA infiltrator of the ‘Black Bloc’) and give the Bush regime all the excuse needed to ‘blitzkrieg’ the world to ashes.

Not that much convincing will be needed to get the majority of American people onside to incinerate all the world’s pedophiles, pederasts, homosexuals, deviants and… commie pinkos (which all happen to live everywhere else – especially Europe).

Folks, you wanted it, and now you got it. My sympathies are with the Ukrainian people who have not been bought by either side of this debacle, and as always they will be the victims.

Ain’t democracy grand?

I keep hearing journalists labelling fighters in Falluja as “insurgents”

the dictionary defines an “insurgent” as someone:

  • Rising in revolt against established authority, especially a government.

calling someone an insurgent thus presupposes an “established authority”…

however, what established authority exists in Iraq?

Allawi? a puppet of the Bushist regime? please…

even I can’t raise enough bile to call al Zarqawi [sic] a “freedom fighter”, but insurgent is giving WAY too much credit to the people trying to export rabid Bushist policy in the Middle East.

call them lunatics, terrorists or rabid dogs but not “insurgents”.

Journalists really need to buy a dictionary and/or stop relying on M$ Word for word synonyms!

Quebec once again says that Newfoundland’s wants and needs are unimportant, and with the complicity of Ontario and some sad excuses for human beings (NF Liberal ministers) they damn well made sure it wasn’t going to see any benefit.

link:
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?
pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=
Article&cid=1100559009265&call_pageid=970599119419

“… the motion was defeated handily, by a vote of 157 to 110.

Bloc Leader Gilles Duceppe said yesterday that he could not go along with the Conservatives on this issue because they are calling for the federal government to simply ignore natural-resource revenues when it does the complicated calculations for sharing wealth in Canada.

Under the complex equalization formula, exclusion of those resources could end up hurting Quebec, Duceppe said.”

This is blatantly anti-Newfoundland…

Quebec has done nothing but prosper from Newfoundland’s one sided relationship from Canada, with successive governments in Ottawa making sure that Quebec’s interests are assured over Newfoundland’s.

When will Newfoundlanders wake up and realize that between Ontario AND Quebec it’s interests will never be defended or championed.

Our death bed was made when the opportunist Smallwood convinced a backward and ignorant population to join Canada.

It would be better for the population of Newfoundland to leave the province and let anyone who wants it rape it of anything left on it…

The alternative would be to fight for it. And we are, apparently, genetically incapable of doing that.

or maybe another Civil war…

and once again… pretty much the South versus the North…

ugly Conservative ignorance and marked lack of willing to progress versus an understanding that “understanding” has to be the only way for the species to progress.

As a Canadian I would certainly love to see the North join with Canada, in many ways their ideals and world direction matches ours, while the south-central US is too… British Imperialist…

It’s too bad that such a huge swath of country is unable to learn from England’s history… thinking and acting morally and politically superior does not indear one to the rest of the world.

However, I in no way would allow it happen… I would take to arms…

the “Red” states… funny how colour can be ironic…

the Red states would nuke the shit out of any “progressive” state to the North…

as we saw on September 11, 2001, fanatical fundamentalists have no regards to human life to ensure and promote their own religious zealotry…

make no mistake… the difference between the USA and Iran or Taliban Afghanistan today is the turbans…

All Canadian’s should feel morally obligated to get a flu shot this year.

Ensure that the supply being diverted to the US does NOT reach there.

just a few days after the Hitler… ahem…. I mean Bush victory, the EVIL Imperialist Force begins training for the eventual take over of the world…

link: http://www.usa.no/policy/eur/eur201.html

NATO Begins Training Iraqi Forces
(Training course in Norway benefits high-level security personnel)

First NATO Course for Iraq Underway in Norway

STAVANGER, Norway – Nineteen Iraqi security personnel are here at NATO’s Joint Warfare Centre participating in the first training conducted outside of Iraq in support of the training mission announced by the Alliance at the Istanbul Summit in June.

The eight-day course, which started Monday, supports the training requested by the interim Iraqi government and has been tailored to meet the needs of mid- to high-ranking Iraqi security personnel.

“Our NATO facility is well placed to offer our Iraqi guests training that will be extremely relevant to the challenges and opportunities they face in rebuilding their country’s security institutions,” said the center’s director, British Army Major-General James Short. The centre specializes in joint headquarters-level training.

The Iraqi participants range from senior military officers to civilian staff with Iraq’s Ministry of Defense and Ministry of the Interior. They were specially selected by Iraqi authorities as “key leaders” from within Iraq’s security forces.

The course focuses on the function of an operational-level headquarters and includes instruction on crisis management, command and control of forces, the operational planning process, and integration of all aspects of civil-military cooperation, including liaison with the UN, Red Cross, and other international organizations.

“Our host nation, Norway, is providing excellent support to this training,” said Major-General Short.

The training will serve as a pilot project for possible follow-on training at the Joint Warfare Centre and back in Iraq. The ultimate aim is to help Iraq develop its own training capability.

Through the NATO Training and Equipment Coordination Group, led by NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander Transformation, the Alliance is coordinating Iraqi requests for further training by NATO or other organizations.

Germany in 1933 Adolph Hitler got the majority of votes to be named Chancellor of Germany…

Then, with an onslaught of propaganda AND a greatly improved economy and national self-image, that majority only increased.

So… does a majority constitute a “right” path?

Call me a commie all you want, but I’m damn well sure that the Jews that baked in the ovens feel that their right to life was a tad bit higher up in the priority pole than the “majorities” wishes.

Yesterday, 58,530,426, malignant putrid bible thumping ignorant pieces of shit voted for a new Fuhrer

The American majority has spoken and, for me at least, have said that they are NOT innocent and do NOT need a clemancy from actions like Sept. 11, 2001.

Bin Laden has been vindicated and his actions against the “enemy combatants” inside the World Trade towers are now proven to be a purely military action.

That being said, also its proven that this is INDEED a fight of

Christianity vs. Islam

All I can hope is that they blow each other the fuck up and leave the rest of the world in peace!

fuck them and their fucking books!!

if I could gather up every single Koran, Bible, Torah and Talmud; piss on them, shit on them and then burn them all I would…

they ban and burn Twain and Shakespeare, but keep alive philosophies that obviously teaches the most vile hateful things imaginable.

Though, I do hope they are right though that there is a God… cause they WOULD burn in hell.